pillbottle.XSmall.jpgIn a previous post in August, I questioned whether the pharmaceutical companies were losing the exemption battle as it related to pharmaceutical sales representatives and the outside sales exemption.  The Supreme Court had declined to review the Second Circuit’s Novartis holding that pharmaceutical sales representatives do not qualify for the outside sales exemption because they

XMasBonus.Revised.XSmall.jpgAs the end of the year rolls around, we inevitably are asked questions related to the payment of bonuses, particularly for those employees who are terminated before annual bonuses are paid out.  Of particular interest is whether an employee who has been terminated – voluntarily or involuntarily – is entitled to a pro rata share

airplane15895164.jpgIn this economy, we continue to see lay-offs and slow growth in hiring.  As a result, more employees are being asked to take on additional responsibilities and assignments.  These circumstances, coupled with the fact that some employers are properly re-classifying certain jobs as non-exempt, have led to an increase in work-related travel for non-exempt employees. 

Frustrated Manager.XSmall.jpgReading about a recent lawsuit filed against Groupon, I was reminded that even the most cutting edge businesses may not understand the nuances associated with calculating overtime and find themselves a target for running afoul of wage and hour laws.  My colleague and fellow blogger, Bill Pokorny, wrote a helpful blog entry last week on

Dollr Sign13528403.jpgQ.        My Company anticipates embarking on a big project this fall that will have extreme importance to the Company’s future and require extra hours at the office.  The Company wants to give a little extra pay to employees who work on this important project.  A number of these employees are classified as exempt.  May the

pillbottle.XSmall.jpgRecently, another group of pharmaceutical sales representatives successfully demonstrated that they are not exempt from overtime under the FLSA.  Kuzinski, et al., v. Schering Corp  Focusing on the administrative exemption, the District Court of Connecticut held that the sales representatives’ work was not directly related to Schering’s management or general business operations and they lacked